Marx's Discourse with Hegel
Format: PDF / Kindle (mobi) / ePub
The product of eight years of research, Levine's study divides Marx's relation to Hegel into two provinces, areas of discontinuity and continuity. Marx's discontinuity from Hegel arose from his negation of the Hegelian System, the belief that Spirit was the predicative force in the universe. Marx's continuity with Hegel concerns Hegelian methodology, or the structural procedures of reason itself described in The Science Of Logic. Marx incorporated the organic image of Hegel and applied it to political economy and Marx interpreted economic systems, Das Kapital, as organic system. Completion of this study required that Levine not only master the bibliography of Marx, but that of Hegel as well and he discovered that a large trove of the manuscripts of the young Hegel were not available to Marx and were only published in the 20th Century. In short, Georg Lukacs and Herbert Marcuse knew more of Hegel than Marx did.
Marx's Discourse With Hegel is the first probe to answer three questions:
Which manuscripts of Hegel did Marx know?
Which manuscripts of Hegel did Marxnot know?
How the invisibility of these young Hegelian texts led to Marx's misreading of Hegel.
The outcome of Marx's ignorance of early Hegel texts led to his misunderstanding of Hegel, but Marx still incorporated Hegelian methodology.
'Levine's work as a whole offers an extraordinarily detailed account of Marx's relations with his great predecessor Hegel, as well as mentors and peers such as Bruno Bauer, Arnold Ruge, Ludwig Feuerbach and, of course, Marx's brother-in-arms, Friedrich Engels. It is a resource no scholar interested in the internal development of Marx's thought is likely to ignore.' - Marx & Philosophy Review of Books
monarchical conservatism was given its clearest expression in his essay ‘Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction’. This essay demonstrated that philosophy could act as a justification of reality, as certifying that the existent was rational and therefore due political loyalty and submissiveness. 2) Philosophy The discontinuities between Marx and Hegel over the role of philosophy was composed of many categories. I will divide my discussion into the following subdivisions: A)
mind in Hegel was the concept of will because will was the telos of the Self, the acquisition of property, and the foundational principles of civil society, property and right. The discontinuity between Hegel and Marx over the issues of theory and practice were most clearly expressed in his September 1843 ‘Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction’ and in his 1845 ‘Theses on Feuerbach’. Marx explained his approach to theory when he wrote in the ‘Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of
achieved. J. Gustav Thaulow’s Hegel’s Views on Education and Instruction127 The temporal boundaries of Marx’s Discourse with Hegel encompass the years 1836–1850 and even though Thaulow’s book exceeds these borders, since it was published in 1854, I will comment on it here. Thaulow’s book was a collection of Hegel exzerpte made while ‘The Master’ was a student in Stuttgart. It is important as a guide to the intellectual interests of the Young Hegel, and to the subjects to which the 15 to
Bauer. This does not mean that Marx surrendered the idea of critique, but he did surrender the idea of subjective self-consciousness. Marx kept the instrument of critique, but he changed the agent from subjectivity to the proletarian class. 6) Marx and Hegel and the philosophy of nature Continuing in the footsteps of Hegel, the Marx of the 1841 dissertation maintained that thought provided the interpretative architecture for the understanding of nature. Sense perception in itself provided only
constitution in his philosophy of law, and the government and the German public concurred in this belief. One way by which the government proved this was the official dissemination of his writings; the public, however, did so by accusing him of being the philosopher of the Prussian state, as one read in the old Leipzig conversational dictionary. What was believed at that time, Stahl believes today. In 1831, by a special order of the government Hegel lectured on the philosophy of law. In 1830, the